Is College Football Broken? | Page 3 | The Platinum Board

Is College Football Broken?

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Is College Football Broken?

Do you agree with Frost and others? Is College football broken?


  • Total voters
    56
Yes. It is unsustainable and they are shrinking the pool of teams that will be able to compete long term... not a good strategy for the long term health of the sport. They need multi year contracts and penalties for transfers of coaches and players imo.
 
While Nebraska sucks, yes
When Nebraskas good, No
It really boils down to this. Is college football a worse product than it was 10 years ago? Absolutely not. Its as balanced as its ever been, people are better athletes in general, and schematically continues to improve.

When your team sucks it's not as enjoyable as when your team is good.
 
I think they need to iron out some things on how to pay players but this is better than before. It has created more parity in the sport. The top few teams aren’t a given to win it it every year like before because they can’t hoard all of the talent. Nick Saban knew this and got out. You even see it high school recruiting. A record number of schools landed 5 star commits.
 
The thing that's wild to me is that you've entered into a period of absolute runaway spending where AD's (and by extension universities and by extension state taxpayers) are entering into larger and larger and larger contracts with coaches while simultaneously having a new expense line of tens of millions of dollars to pay labor. I don't know that I expected there to be a correction in coach contracts to account for this fact, but I don't know how the system doesn't eventually implode.

Yes. It is unsustainable and they are shrinking the pool of teams that will be able to compete long term... not a good strategy for the long term health of the sport. They need multi year contracts and penalties for transfers of coaches and players imo.

Yup, as the “going rate” for a starting QB/WR/OT/DE etc… keeps inflating, combined with astronomical coaching salaries fewer and fewer teams will be able to compete at the highest level of CFB.

Imagine if the NFL said… No more salary caps and all contracts are year to year. It wouldn’t take very long until the same 3ish richest teams/owners were winning the superbowl every year. This is where CFB is going, probably already there. Pretty much…
 
I think they need to iron out some things on how to pay players but this is better than before. It has created more parity in the sport. The top few teams aren’t a given to win it it every year like before because they can’t hoard all of the talent. Nick Saban knew this and got out. You even see it high school recruiting. A record number of schools landed 5 star commits.

Parity 🤣 They’re pissing on you and calling it rain. Just cause more teams are in the playoffs (which is good) doesn’t mean there are more teams capable of winning a NC. Actually less in my opinion.
 
Yup, as the “going rate” for a starting QB/WR/OT/DE etc… keeps inflating, combined with astronomical coaching salaries fewer and fewer teams will be able to compete at the highest level of CFB.

Imagine if the NFL said… No more salary caps and all contracts are year to year. It wouldn’t take very long until the same 3ish richest teams/owners were winning the superbowl every year. This is where CFB is going, probably already there. Pretty much…
There is a lot more parity now than before NIL existed. I think it gives us a better shot at winning meaningful games. Rhule even said he has everything he needs money wise to compete at a top level now.
 
Parity 🤣 They’re pissing on you and calling it rain. Just cause more teams are in the playoffs (which is good) doesn’t mean there are more teams capable of winning a NC. Actually less in my opinion.
You’re nuts if you think teams like Bama and Georgia are still in the same position they were before NIL. They can’t stack the depth they use to. It definitely gave other teams a shot like Texas Tech if they are willing to spend money.
 
It ain't broken; people just hate change.

And its changing quickly because the conferences and NCAA didn't do anything for years, so when the floodgate opened up, it opened up quickly.
People do hate change but the management of THIS change has been horrible.
 
You’re nuts if you think teams like Bama and Georgia are still in the same position they were before NIL. They can’t stack the depth they use to. It definitely gave other teams a shot like Texas Tech if they are willing to spend money.

I think the initial effect of the portal, NIL and expanded playoffs can look like parity on the surface. But until a non-SEC or B1G team wins a NC (probably never) I don’t see parity nationally. What we have is a consolidation to talent in 2 conferences and some more parity within those conferences, but we don’t have parity across CFB.
 
I think the initial effect of the portal, NIL and expanded playoffs can look like parity on the surface. But until a non-SEC or B1G team wins a NC (probably never) I don’t see parity nationally. What we have is a consolidation to talent in 2 conferences and some more parity within those conferences, but we don’t have parity across CFB.
A Texas Tech or SMU type team can definitely win a title if they keep spending money. When Vandy is the best program in Tennessee and Tennessee isn’t a dog shit program, there is more parity. Before NIL the Missouri coach and Vandy coach would have took the PSU job in a second but they won’t now because they have good NIL programs.
 
When BYU wins, and Bama wins, and the byes are 2 SEC and 2 B1G, lets reconvene and look at all of the problems in the insane power consolidation.

Thank you. We don’t have parity. We have 2 conferences that have consolidated the lion’s share of power and money. Now it’s a contest of which B1G and SEC teams can independently and privately secure the most money to spend on players and coaches.
 
A Texas Tech or SMU type team can definitely win a title if they keep spending money. When Vandy is the best program in Tennessee and Tennessee isn’t a dog shit program, there is more parity. Before NIL the Missouri coach and Vandy coach would have took the PSU job in a second but they won’t now because they have good NIL programs.
Bro lmfao Vandy wins one game with a Heisman finalist qb as Tennessee had its qb dip out mid-spring and you think Vandy is a better program. Laughable.
 
A Texas Tech or SMU type team can definitely win a title if they keep spending money. When Vandy is the best program in Tennessee and Tennessee isn’t a dog shit program, there is more parity. Before NIL the Missouri coach and Vandy coach would have took the PSU job in a second but they won’t now because they have good NIL programs.

SMU will never win a NC. They have private money, but they’ll never be able to keep a HC and they’ll always have over pay for top talent. Most kids believe the B1G and SEC are the best path to the NFL and the biggest pool of high dollar NIL contracts. Not to mention they’re already behind the 8 ball money wise because of their shitty TV contract. SMU… never ever gonna win a NC. Period.

TT… maybe. They actually have more private money than SMU, so I’ve been told. Never actually tried to check that out myself. Also anchored with a shitty TV deal and poor reputation for putting players in the NFL. But I think maybe TT could. Not gonna pick’em this year, no way. But I like that they can play some defense and stop the run. Can they stop the run against teams like Georgia, Notre Dame, aTm? Probably no IMO. Good thing is we will likely get to see this play out and then we’ll know.
 
SMU will never win a NC. They have private money, but they’ll never be able to keep a HC and they’ll always have over pay for top talent. Most kids believe the B1G and SEC are the best path to the NFL and the biggest pool of high dollar NIL contracts. Not to mention they’re already behind the 8 ball money wise because of their shitty TV contract. SMU… never ever gonna win a NC. Period.

TT… maybe. They actually have more private money than SMU, so I’ve been told. Never actually tried to check that out myself. Also anchored with a shitty TV deal and poor reputation for putting players in the NFL. But I think maybe TT could. Not gonna pick’em this year, no way. But I like that they can play some defense and stop the run. Can they stop the run against teams like Georgia, Notre Dame, aTm? Probably no IMO. Good thing is we will likely get to see this play out and then we’ll know.
You know more than me here, but isn't the biggest problem kids taking less to go to OSU, Georgia and wherever so even these rich non B1G or SEC schools money doesn't go as far as the blue bloods?
 
You know more than me here, but isn't the biggest problem kids taking less to go to OSU, Georgia and wherever so even these rich non B1G or SEC schools money doesn't go as far as the blue bloods?

It’s true. If my consensus NIL market value is 2 million. I’d go to Georgia, OSU, Bama or Michigan for 1.75 mil. Fucking no brainer.

Edit: And it might cost some school 2.5 mil to secure my services. This is what we created. 😒
 
It’s true. If my consensus NIL market value is 2 million. I’d go to Georgia, OSU, Bama or Michigan for 1.75 mil. Fucking no brainer.

Edit: And it might cost some school 2.5 mil to secure my services. This is what we created. 😒
Yea, I'm assuming Nebraska is overpaying like a motherfucker.
 
Back
Top