- Messages
- 298
- Likes
- 837
Happy Enders when he plays well, Sandys when he plays poorly?Who gets to claim him, Sandy vages or happy enders?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Happy Enders when he plays well, Sandys when he plays poorly?Who gets to claim him, Sandy vages or happy enders?
Sandy Vag CrewWho gets to claim him, Sandy vages or happy enders?
Let’s see how the next two weeks play out.Who gets to claim him, Sandy vages or happy enders?
It’s not having criticism, but the way people would criticize. There’s a difference between criticizing his play and just shitting on the kid or insulting him relentlessly.People have had valid criticisms of Raiola all year and were labeled “potatoes” and haters. For whatever reason, majority of fan base has major blinders when it comes to Raiola and his clear shortcomings and freak the fuck out if you say anything negative about it.
💯It’s not having criticism, but the way people would criticize. There’s a difference between criticizing his play and just shitting on the kid or insulting him relentlessly.
Who’s this fucking dipshitWell i’ve got great news for you pal, Cade Jacobson is in our starting 5 this year
Who’s this fucking dipshit
Iwbh, there's only two or three folks on here that have really gone over the line and have insulted him. The vast majority of criticism is attacking real and/or perceived shortcomings in his game. I know this will upset the "spend the whole time bitching about other fans in the game thread" crew fwiw hth gbrIt’s not having criticism, but the way people would criticize. There’s a difference between criticizing his play and just shitting on the kid or insulting him relentlessly.
I don’t doubt that this is what you want to believeIwbh, there's only two or three folks on here that have really gone over the line and have insulted him. The vast majority of criticism is attacking real and/or perceived shortcomings in his game. I know this will upset the "spend the whole time bitching about other fans in the game thread" crew fwiw hth gbr
Good post!It’s not having criticism, but the way people would criticize. There’s a difference between criticizing his play and just shitting on the kid or insulting him relentlessly.
I don’t doubt that this is what you want to believe
There are a certain number of posters who will get their tiny dicks offended anytime someone posts something that is contrary to the theme that everything is great. They are people who are incapable of dealing with critical thinking. They live in black and white worlds where everything has to be white. They are easy enough to identify by the number of potato reactions they use.People have had valid criticisms of Raiola all year and were labeled “potatoes” and haters. For whatever reason, majority of fan base has major blinders when it comes to Raiola and his clear shortcomings and freak the fuck out if you say anything negative about it.
Exactly. Some of the stuff posted last night was uncalled for. People calling him a fat turd, loser, etc was low.It’s not having criticism, but the way people would criticize. There’s a difference between criticizing his play and just shitting on the kid or insulting him relentlessly.
Kind of
Funny you say that… the same thing could be said for a certain group of posters who are ready to ship Dylan off to the portal after one game, while acting like Nebraska just took down the 1998 UCLA Bruins instead of a team that started 0–4, got outscored 125–57, and fired its coach. Perspective cuts both ways.There are a certain number of posters who will get their tiny dicks offended anytime someone posts something that is contrary to the theme that everything is great. They are people who are incapable of dealing with critical thinking. They live in black and white worlds where everything has to be white. They are easy enough to identify by the number of potato reactions they use.
Hey if people want to think that who gives a shit? It's the thought police that piss me off. If someone posts that Dylan needs to go after one game of LaTeef that is their right. I don't agree but hey guess what? I ignore them and don't spend any energy trying to shame or silence them. That is my beef.Funny you say that… the same thing could be said for a certain group of posters who are ready to ship Dylan off to the portal after one game, while acting like Nebraska just took down the 1998 UCLA Bruins instead of a team that started 0–4, got outscored 125–57, and fired its coach. Perspective cuts both ways.
So you shame people who post their disagreements?Hey if people want to think that who gives a shit? It's the thought police that piss me off. If someone posts that Dylan needs to go after one game of LaTeef that is their right. I don't agree but hey guess what? I ignore them and don't spend any energy trying to shame or silence them. That is my beef.