CFB Playoff Expansion | The Platinum Board

CFB Playoff Expansion

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

CFB Playoff Expansion

Kaladin

Professor of Aesthetics / Positive Boogeyman
Elite Member
Messages
18,647
Likes
48,901
Link

With College Football Playoff change looming, a 12-team model leads the way​


Yahoo Sports spoke to more than a dozen stakeholders Monday on every side of the playoff decision – university officials, athletic directors, media executives and others around college sports. Amid those conversations, a surprise emerged — officials on campuses, in conference offices and in the television world have expressed an openness toward a 12-team playoff as the most likely result.

While it’s unfair to say momentum has built toward a 12-team playoff before models have been presented to the commissioners or presidents, the 12-team model has emerged as the favored outcome over the eight-team playoff within the industry.

“The reason that you go to 12 is because you can develop the road of least resistance toward a good result,” said a high-ranking college official with knowledge of the process.
 
I used to hate the idea of more than 4, but I’m on board. Bowl games outside the CFP are boring anyway. Expand the field, have more meaningful post season games, provide broader access, and still puts a premium on being in the top 4 (regular season stays important). I’m all for 12 teams.
 
I'm torn. IF, and I do mean IF CFB players retain their current "amateur" status, then I'm against it. It's pretty clear the universities, conferences, NCAA and sports programming content providers all benefit BIGLY from their labors. And adding a few more games increases the likelihood for injury and wear-n-tear on their bodies that doesn't show up until they're older. As an older guy, I say this with certainty.

HOWEVER, if they're about to become paid athletes, then it's part of the gig (NFL and alt-league proving grounds) and their compensation should be adjusted accordingly.

As in most things in life, follow the money and you'll find the answers waiting for you there. My $0.02 worth.
 
Now 8 SEC teams can make it in every year instead of 3?

Yay!
 
Who would have made in it 2020?

Big 10: OSU
Big 12: Oklahoma
ACC: Clemson
SEC: Alabama
P16: Oregon
G5: Cincinnati

then who?

Notre Dame
Texas A&M
Indiana
Georgia
Cockeye State
Florida

coastal carolina?
 
Who would have made in it 2020?

Big 10: OSU
Big 12: Oklahoma
ACC: Clemson
SEC: Alabama
P16: Oregon
G5: Cincinnati

then who?

Notre Dame
Texas A&M
Indiana
Georgia
Cockeyes State
Florida

coastal carolina?
For money and entertainment value more teams are better. In reality only 3-4 teams are capable of winning it. It’s Bama and maybe another sec team, Clemson, and OSU every year. The rest don’t have a prayer.
 
I'm ok with 12 but I'd like to see them make it a requirement to win your conference to get a top 4 bye.

Adds some big time intrigue to the title games and prevents 1 conference from having multiple byes.
 


NU to playoff confirmed.

I can’t wait for Nebraska to host its first playoff game

Jack Nicholson Reaction GIF
 

This is actually a good idea. This actually preserves the Big 12 and ACC. So anyone worried about your KSUs and ISUs dropping to the minor league should supporting this idea. Those teams should be doing backflips over this idea.

28 teams seems crazy but not when you consider there are 57 teams in the P4 alone. FBS has 136 in total.

The NFL has 14 of 32 teams make the playoffs (43%).

28 teams for a 136 team league is not out of line.
 
I'm curious what the naysayers would prefer for a better system?

Are you guys still clinging to bowl games? Those are over man.

The way forward is playoffs man. Not more meaningless lawn mower and Duke's Mayo bowl games.
 
I'm curious what the naysayers would prefer for a better system?

Are you guys still clinging to bowl games? Those are over man.

The way forward is playoffs man. Not more meaningless lawn mower and Duke's Mayo bowl games.
I admittedly haven’t put a ton of thought into it, but to me it’s just too many teams. Feels 100% more like a money grab than something that’s actually good for the sport.

I think back to the playoff this past season and just can’t imagine we need any more than that. I could potentially be talked into a 16-team model, but any more than that is overkill IMO.
 
This is actually a good idea. This actually preserves the Big 12 and ACC. So anyone worried about your KSUs and ISUs dropping to the minor league should supporting this idea. Those teams should be doing backflips over this idea.

28 teams seems crazy but not when you consider there are 57 teams in the P4 alone. FBS has 136 in total.

The NFL has 14 of 32 teams make the playoffs (43%).

28 teams for a 136 team league is not out of line.
I agree with you. Fan interest would increase.
 
I think back to the playoff this past season and just can’t imagine we need any more than that. I could potentially be talked into a 16-team model, but any more than that is overkill IMO.
If there were 28 teams instead of 16, would you watch the incremental games and be interested in their outcomes? I'd bet you would.
 
Back
Top