Nebrasketball 2025 Portal Szn + Roster Ins/Outs | Page 3 | The Platinum Board

Nebrasketball 2025 Portal Szn + Roster Ins/Outs

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Nebrasketball 2025 Portal Szn + Roster Ins/Outs

Reverse, for Connor & Keisei junior season

Essegian from 3, B1G only
Home = 15-55, 27.2% (3-23, 13%, last 4 games at PBA)
Away = 22-57, 38.6% (13-26, 50%, last 4 games away)

Total B1G = 37-112, 33%

Non-conference, all games home/away = 33-74, 44.6%

Tominaga junior season, same criteria
Home = 25-65, 38.4% (caught a heater last 5 games; 17-38, 45%)
Away = 21-47, 44.7% (heater too, minus the 1-4 at Ioa)
His last 9 B1G games were 👀

Total B1G = 46-112, 41%

Non-conference, all games home/away = 18-47, 38%
Good pulls, thank you. I still have trust in him as a shooter and player, but damn, he picked the worst time to go ice cold at home. When he was usually the only 'shooter' on the court, it was hard not to notice how horrific he was to end the season at PBA. Unfortunate for him, because he had a big part in the comeback @ NW and the comeback attempt at Ohio State. Played well at Penn State... but we all know how that game went.

And to add to the discussion re: comparing his back cuts and movement off the ball to Keisei... he tried to move off the ball, but he didn't have a passing big like Walker or Mast to find him. I don't know if tape would show this, but it felt like he didn't do as many back cuts towards the end of the season because it was usually all for not.
 
Last edited:
While it's not an exact comparison, people need to remember the Keisei wasnt the Keisei we loved his first year. He came in with hype from that shooting video and then was very average. Then suddenly his game evolved and he exploded. Not too dissimilar from Essegian, although Essegian ended up with comparable numbers from deep to Keiseis better years. Let's hope he can add another dimension and consistency to his game. He could be our primary scorer if he does.
Did Keisei improve or did he just finally get his shot once Bandoumel got hurt? Only reason got extended playing time his Junior year was Bandoumel got hurt.
 
Did Keisei improve or did he just finally get his shot once Bandoumel got hurt? Only reason got extended playing time his Junior year was Bandoumel got hurt.
Both. He really wasn't lighting the world on fire when he got minutes. But then yes that injury forced him into the line up and he hit his stride.
 
Both. He really wasn't lighting the world on fire when he got minutes. But then yes that injury forced him into the line up and he hit his stride.
He started putting up numbers as soon as he got extended playing time. He wasn’t good in the few minutes a game he was getting before because he’s a streaky sniper, he needs to get into his groove and they didn’t allow him to. I think it’s more likely that he was always that good and once he got his shot he “exploded” than he improved enough to explode mid season.
 
Good pulls, thank you. I still have trust in him as a shooter and player, but damn, he picked the worst time to go ice cold at home. When he was usually the only 'shooter' on the court, it was hard not to notice how horrific he was to end the season at PBA. Unfortunate for him, because he had a big part in the comeback @ NW and the comeback attempt at Ohio State. Played well at Penn State... but we all know how that game went.

And to add to the discussion re: comparing his back cuts and movement off the ball to Keisei... he tried to move off the ball, but he didn't have a passing big like Walker or Mast to find him. I don't know if tape would show this, but it felt like he didn't do as many back cuts towards the end of the season because it was usually all for not.

Essegian is kinda all alone out there as a shooter as well, at least Tominaga had Wilcher and Lawrence and even Mast. Worster, Gary and Buyuktuncel aren't as big of a threat as outside shooters.
 

I don’t subscribe but maybe someone could share


How much does it cost to build a top-25 college basketball roster? Coaches share insights on NIL and the Transfer Portal​

The D-I men’s college basketball transfer portal will open on March 24 and remain open until April 22. In 2024, over 2,100 players entered the D-I portal, while another 1,400 joined the D-II portal, and over 700 in the D-III portal. Across all three divisions, the total number of players who entered the men’s college basketball transfer portal eclipsed 4,200.

With these transfer portal numbers reaching such extremes, the transfer portal has undoubtedly become a hot-button item across the college basketball landscape.


As we approach the 2025 Transfer Portal window, I wanted to gain insight into where college coaches stand. To do so, I spoke with the coaches of top teams across multiple power conferences. My goal was to understand what the coaches expected a competitive roster to cost in this upcoming portal cycle, how the NIL would be allocated throughout their roster, and which positions are expected to attract the most NIL attention.
As we approach the 2025 Transfer Portal window, I wanted to gain insight into where college coaches stand. To do so, I spoke with the coaches of top teams across multiple power conferences. My goal was to understand what the coaches expected a competitive roster to cost in this upcoming portal cycle, how the NIL would be allocated throughout their roster, and which positions are expected to attract the most NIL attention.

How much NIL would you say it costs to build a roster able to compete as a top-25-type team?​

There are a lot of numbers that are floating around when it comes to NIL spending around the college basketball landscape. And a quick look at the current men’s basketball A.P. Top 25 Poll and you can see there are different ways to build a roster that will win a lot of games.

Duke, the current No. 1 team, brought back two rotation players from last year’s 27-9 team. The Blue Devils added six freshmen along with three transfers. Houston, the No. 2 team currently, had a different approach. They brought in one transfer, Milos Uzan, and the other eight players who average ten or more minutes this season all return from last year’s roster.

A quick look down the list, the leading scorer for No. 3 ranked Auburn (Johni Broome), No. 4 ranked Florida (Walter Clayton), No. 5 ranked Alabama (Mark Sears), and so on, all came to their current schools as transfers.

There is no one way to build a winning roster, however, one thing that was universally brought up in my discussions is that you are going to have to utilize NIL funding.

“In this portal, I think you’ll need a minimum of 4.5 million,” a coach in the ACC told me. “And that’s if you do a hell of a job evaluating.”

After talking for a little bit, that same coach added, “To be safe, it’ll be about 6 million to be a top-25 team.”

That range seemed to be pretty consistent with what coaches around the college basketball landscape suggested.

“To be a top-25 caliber team, you’re going to have to be around 4 to 5 million,” an SEC coach said. A former coach in the Big 12 shared the same though, “It’ll be no less than 5 million to be in the top 25.”

As part of a proposed settlement, athletic departments will be allowed to share their revenue (media rights, sponsorships, ticket sales, etc.) with their athletes beginning in 2025. The proposed rev share plan is that schools can pay their athletes directly, up to a cap of 20.5 million for all sports.

Even with the proposed rev share model expected this upcoming season, college coaches expect it will take more to compete.

A coach in the Big 12 said, “It will take nothing less than 5 million after rev share.”

Landing on the higher end of things, a coach in the ACC said they expect it to be more this cycle, “Will probably be between 6 and 7 million for a team to compete.”

How do you divvy up your funds throughout your roster?​

We have established that building a top-25-type roster is expected to cost between 4 and 8 million in NIL. So, with that budget in mind, how do teams allocate this money throughout their roster?

A coach in the Big 12 explained it like this, “Your top eight players need to get between 85 and 90 percent of your total. The rest of the roster takes up the remaining about. It’s more than setting aside a certain amount for retention or for the Transfer Portal, if you see a high school kid coming in and being a starter, give him what you feel the market value is for that position.”
 

How much does it cost to build a top-25 college basketball roster? Coaches share insights on NIL and the Transfer Portal​

The D-I men’s college basketball transfer portal will open on March 24 and remain open until April 22. In 2024, over 2,100 players entered the D-I portal, while another 1,400 joined the D-II portal, and over 700 in the D-III portal. Across all three divisions, the total number of players who entered the men’s college basketball transfer portal eclipsed 4,200.

With these transfer portal numbers reaching such extremes, the transfer portal has undoubtedly become a hot-button item across the college basketball landscape.


As we approach the 2025 Transfer Portal window, I wanted to gain insight into where college coaches stand. To do so, I spoke with the coaches of top teams across multiple power conferences. My goal was to understand what the coaches expected a competitive roster to cost in this upcoming portal cycle, how the NIL would be allocated throughout their roster, and which positions are expected to attract the most NIL attention.
As we approach the 2025 Transfer Portal window, I wanted to gain insight into where college coaches stand. To do so, I spoke with the coaches of top teams across multiple power conferences. My goal was to understand what the coaches expected a competitive roster to cost in this upcoming portal cycle, how the NIL would be allocated throughout their roster, and which positions are expected to attract the most NIL attention.

How much NIL would you say it costs to build a roster able to compete as a top-25-type team?​

There are a lot of numbers that are floating around when it comes to NIL spending around the college basketball landscape. And a quick look at the current men’s basketball A.P. Top 25 Poll and you can see there are different ways to build a roster that will win a lot of games.

Duke, the current No. 1 team, brought back two rotation players from last year’s 27-9 team. The Blue Devils added six freshmen along with three transfers. Houston, the No. 2 team currently, had a different approach. They brought in one transfer, Milos Uzan, and the other eight players who average ten or more minutes this season all return from last year’s roster.

A quick look down the list, the leading scorer for No. 3 ranked Auburn (Johni Broome), No. 4 ranked Florida (Walter Clayton), No. 5 ranked Alabama (Mark Sears), and so on, all came to their current schools as transfers.

There is no one way to build a winning roster, however, one thing that was universally brought up in my discussions is that you are going to have to utilize NIL funding.

“In this portal, I think you’ll need a minimum of 4.5 million,” a coach in the ACC told me. “And that’s if you do a hell of a job evaluating.”

After talking for a little bit, that same coach added, “To be safe, it’ll be about 6 million to be a top-25 team.”

That range seemed to be pretty consistent with what coaches around the college basketball landscape suggested.

“To be a top-25 caliber team, you’re going to have to be around 4 to 5 million,” an SEC coach said. A former coach in the Big 12 shared the same though, “It’ll be no less than 5 million to be in the top 25.”

As part of a proposed settlement, athletic departments will be allowed to share their revenue (media rights, sponsorships, ticket sales, etc.) with their athletes beginning in 2025. The proposed rev share plan is that schools can pay their athletes directly, up to a cap of 20.5 million for all sports.

Even with the proposed rev share model expected this upcoming season, college coaches expect it will take more to compete.

A coach in the Big 12 said, “It will take nothing less than 5 million after rev share.”

Landing on the higher end of things, a coach in the ACC said they expect it to be more this cycle, “Will probably be between 6 and 7 million for a team to compete.”

How do you divvy up your funds throughout your roster?​

We have established that building a top-25-type roster is expected to cost between 4 and 8 million in NIL. So, with that budget in mind, how do teams allocate this money throughout their roster?

A coach in the Big 12 explained it like this, “Your top eight players need to get between 85 and 90 percent of your total. The rest of the roster takes up the remaining about. It’s more than setting aside a certain amount for retention or for the Transfer Portal, if you see a high school kid coming in and being a starter, give him what you feel the market value is for that position.”
And we are at 2-2.5? Yikes.
 
I dont see HS recruiting as a fix...unless you're landing Ace Bailey or Derek Queen, no one is walking through that door that will help instantly.

We were bottom 4 in the BIG in NIL spending for bball. NIL fundraising has improved a lot under Dannen...he was just hired when we were portal hunting last spring. NIL + revenue sharing should provide a decent pool of money to go get some players. But then there are no excuses for Fred.
Bryce McGowens could have been an all time great as a freshman if he had any help.
 
An underrated portion of Keisei’s game was his ability to cut to the rim and finish around big men. It’s funny because when you look at his dad being 9ft tall you understand that he probably spent many a practices shooting around the rim around his dad and start to see why.

If Connor can start to be a threat to do similar it should allow him to get open for his shot from 3 easier. Too many times we tried to run a set for him and for one reason or another he just couldn’t get open.
That was apart of the whole "Japanese Steph Curry" moniker. He emulated Curry's game to a tee, including those back door cuts without the ball.
 
Essegian is kinda all alone out there as a shooter as well, at least Tominaga had Wilcher and Lawrence and even Mast. Worster, Gary and Buyuktuncel aren't as big of a threat as outside shooters.
This was my thought as well. Next year Essegian will be on the floor with Mast, Griffiths (if potential holds through), Buyuktuncel (He can develop an outside shot). I see us having more shooters on the floor at all times next season.
 
Back
Top