NCAA Statistical Leaders (11/16) | The Platinum Board

NCAA Statistical Leaders (11/16)

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

NCAA Statistical Leaders (11/16)

Alum-Ni

Graduate Assistant
Stats Guy
Messages
5,923
Likes
12,449
The top ten, the Huskers, the Illini and the bottom-ranked team

TOTAL OFFENSE
1. Central Florida - 619.1 ypg
2. North Texas - 593.6
3. Mississippi - 564.9
4. North Carolina - 563.4
5. Alabama - 555.2
6. Kent State - 549.0
7. Oregon - 538.5
8. BYU - 533.4
9. USC - 527.0
10. Oklahoma - 515.0
84. Nebraska - 370.0
95. Illinois - 354.8
124. Massachusetts - 190.5

RUSH OFFENSE
1. Air Force - 330.0 ypg
2. Army - 303.4
3. San Diego State - 280.3
4. Georgia Southern - 275.8
5. Oregon - 269.0
6. Washington - 267.0
7. Virginia Tech - 262.8
8. Wisconsin - 261.5
9. Appalachian State - 261.4
10. Arizona State - 258.0
27. Illinois - 206.8
37. Nebraska - 193.3

124. Mississippi State - 21.5

PASS OFFENSE
1. Central Florida - 396.9 ypg
2. Nevada - 382.8
3. Alabama - 380.0
4. Florida - 371.7
5. Memphis - 354.7
6. Clemson - 353.6
7. USC - 353.0
8. Mississippi - 352.1
9. Oklahoma - 350.0
10. BYU - 340.5
106. Nebraska - 176.7
111. Illinois - 148.0
124. Army - 53.4

SCORING OFFENSE
1. Western Michigan - 49.5 ppg
2. Alabama - 47.2
3. Wisconsin - 47.0
4. Ohio State - 46.3
5. Oklahoma - 46.1
6. Florida - 45.8
7. Buffalo - 45.5
8. Clemson - 45.4
9. BYU - 45.3
10. Kent State - 44.5
110. Nebraska - 20.0
114. Illinois - 17.0
124. Massachusetts - 5.0

PASS EFFICIENCY
1. Ohio State - 222.38
2. Buffalo - 213.01
3. Western Michigan - 206.25
4. Wisconsin - 201.40
5. Alabama - 200.68
6. BYU - 192.91
7. Mississippi - 191.13
8. Florida - 191.04
9. North Carolina - 182.23
10. Coastal Carolina - 181.80
111. Nebraska - 110.26
116. Illinois - 103.99
124. Bowling Green - 59.14

COMPLETION PERCENTAGE
1. Ohio State - 86.7%
2. Alabama - 76.2
3. Wisconsin - 74.4
4. Mississippi - 73.9
5. BYU - 73.8
6. USC - 71.4
7. Nevada - 70.9
8. Oklahoma - 69.7
9. San Jose State - 68.9
9. Maryland - 68.9
60. Nebraska - 61.6
122. Illinois - 45.1
124. Bowling Green - 28.0

TURNOVERS LOST
1. Western Michigan - 0
1. Washington - 0
3. Kent State - 1
3. Colorado - 1
3. Washington State - 1
3. Central Michigan - 1
3. Stanford - 1
3. Wisconsin - 1
3. Wake Forest - 1
10. Ohio State - 2
10. Ohio - 2
10. Oregon State - 2
10. Toledo - 2
10. Miami (OH) - 2
10. Colorado State - 2
10. Florida International - 2
10. Air Force - 2
10. Buffalo - 2
35. Nebraska - 5
51. Illinois - 7
124. Duke - 25

SACKS ALLOWED (per game)
1. Washington - 0.00
1. Buffalo - 0.00
3. Air Force - 0.33
3. Texas A&M - 0.33
5. Alabama-Birmingham - 0.43
6. Oregon - 0.50
6. Colorado - 0.50
6. Stanford - 0.50
9. Marshall - 0.71
10. Cockeye - 0.75
10. San Jose State - 0.75
42. Nebraska - 1.67
81. Illinois - 2.50
124. Kansas - 5.43

TACKLES FOR LOSS ALLOWED (per game)
1. Washington - 2.00
2. Buffalo - 2.50
3. Western Michigan - 3.00
4. Marshall - 3.29
5. North Texas - 3.40
6. Texas A&M - 3.50
6. Washington State - 3.50
6. Georgia - 3.50
9. Louisiana-Lafayette - 3.63
10. Air Force - 3.67
24. Illinois - 4.50
56. Nebraska - 6.00

124. Kansas - 10.29

THIRD DOWN CONVERSION PERCENTAGE
1. Oregon - 72.7%
2. Texas A&M - 62.0
3. Wisconsin - 59.3
4. UCLA - 58.3
5. Ohio State - 58.1
6. Alabama - 57.4
7. Toledo - 55.6
8. Appalachian State - 53.8
9. Notre Dame - 53.6
10. Marshall - 53.3
97. Illinois - 34.6
109. Nebraska - 31.6

124. Bowling Green - 18.5

RED ZONE OFFENSE
1. UCLA - 100.0%
1. Akron - 100.0
1. Arizona State - 100.0
1. Bowling Green - 100.0
1. Boise State - 100.0
1. Buffalo - 100.0
1. Colorado - 100.0
1. Eastern Michigan - 100.0
1. Washington State - 100.0
1. Western Michigan - 100.0
1. Wisconsin - 100.0
1. Massachusetts - 100.0
1. Michigan State - 100.0
1. New Mexico - 100.0
1. Northern Illinois - 100.0
93. Nebraska - 76.9
124. Illinois - 61.5

====================================

TOTAL DEFENSE
1. Wisconsin - 218.5 ypg
2. San Diego State - 243.5
3. Washington - 252.0
4. Marshall - 259.7
5. West Virginia - 274.0
6. BYU - 284.9
7. Army - 286.6
8. Central Michigan - 294.5
9. Pittsburgh - 296.5
10. Cincinnati - 300.9
84. Nebraska - 436.3
104. Illinois - 465.5
124. Bowling Green - 595.5

RUSH DEFENSE
1. Marshall - 65.3 ypg
2. Pittsburgh - 78.8
3. New Mexico - 81.0
4. Georgia - 82.8
5. Notre Dame - 85.1
6. Wisconsin - 89.0
7. San Diego State - 91.3
8. Northwestern - 91.8
9. Central Michigan - 92.0
10. Georgia Southern - 92.6
87. Illinois - 188.3
97. Nebraska - 202.7

124. Bowling Green - 302.5

PASS DEFENSE
1. Washington - 85.0 ypg
2. Wisconsin - 129.5
3. San Diego State - 152.3
4. West Virginia - 161.5
5. Hawaii - 162.8
6. Western Kentucky - 167.2
7. Oklahoma State - 169.3
8. Kent State - 173.0
9. Liberty - 173.8
10. Boise State - 174.3
61. Nebraska - 233.7
105. Illinois - 277.3
124. New Mexico - 410.3

SCORING DEFENSE
1. Wisconsin - 9.0 ppg
2. Marshall - 10.1
3. Cincinnati - 12.4
4. San Diego State - 12.8
5. Florida Atlantic - 13.0
6. BYU - 13.9
7. Northwestern - 14.0
8. Cockeye - 14.8
9. Army - 15.0
10. San Jose State - 15.3
76. Nebraska - 32.0
88. Illinois - 34.3
124. Bowling Green - 50.0

PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
1. Washington - 67.25
2. Wisconsin - 83.45
3. Northwestern - 91.17
4. Cincinnati - 91.41
5. Appalachian State - 92.74
6. Cockeye - 100.65
7. Buffalo - 101.42
8. Louisiana-Lafayette - 102.15
9. Hawaii - 102.61
10. San Diego State - 105.41
72. Nebraska - 139.18
119. Illinois - 175.35
124. Northern Illinois - 184.39

TURNOVERS GAINED
1. Central Florida - 19
2. Boston College - 17
2. Syracuse - 17
4. Wake Forest - 16
4. Cincinnati - 16
4. Arkansas - 16
7. Southern Methodist - 15
7. Louisiana-Lafayette - 15
7. Georgia State - 15
7. Texas-San Antonio - 15
22. Illinois - 12
82. Nebraska - 5

(several teams tied for last with zero)

SACKS (per game)
1. Fresno State - 5.00
2. Pittsburgh - 4.75
3. Colorado State - 4.33
4. Florida Atlantic - 3.80
5. Clemson - 3.75
5. Virginia Tech - 3.75
7. Oklahoma - 3.71
8. Wyoming - 3.67
8. Oklahoma State - 3.67
10. Coastal Carolina - 3.57
63. Nebraska - 2.00
63. Illinois - 2.00
(several teams tied for last with zero)

TACKLES FOR LOSS (per game)
1. Pittsburgh - 11.6
2. Colorado State - 10.3
3. Clemson - 9.1
4. San Diego State - 9.0
5. Tulane - 8.7
6. Tulsa - 8.6
7. Miami (FL) - 8.5
7. Western Michigan - 8.5
7. Kent State - 8.5
7. Bowling Green - 8.5
62. Nebraska - 6.0
69. Illinois - 5.8
124. Akron - 1.8

THIRD DOWN CONVERSION PERCENTAGE DEFENSE
1. Northern Illinois - 20.0%
2. Toledo - 20.8
3. Central Michigan - 23.1
4. Oklahoma State - 23.3
5. San Diego State - 23.7
6. Wisconsin - 23.8
7. Notre Dame - 26.0
8. Kent State - 26.9
9. Boise State - 27.3
10. Oklahoma - 28.0
112. Nebraska - 50.0
114. Illinois - 51.0
124. Stanford - 68.0

RED ZONE DEFENSE
1. Wisconsin - 0.0%
2. Florida Atlantic - 54.5
3. Indiana - 55.6
4. Purdue - 64.7
5. Arizona State - 66.7
5. Washington - 66.7
5. San Diego State - 66.7
8. Georgia Southern - 68.0
9. Cincinnati - 68.4
10. Kentucky - 69.2
10. Marshall - 69.2
36. Nebraska - 80.0
72. Illinois - 85.0
(multiple schools tied for last at 100.0%)

===================================

NET PUNTING
1. Cockeye - 46.15 ypk
2. Georgia - 45.83
3. UCLA - 45.67
4. Georgia Tech - 45.00
5. Miami (FL) - 44.67
6. Arizona State - 44.60
7. Nevada - 44.46
8. Miami (OH) - 43.91
9. Florida Atlantic - 43.70
10. LSU - 43.64
20. Illinois - 41.68
109. Nebraska - 34.21

124. Washington - 8.33

PUNT RETURNS
1. Oregon State - 31.00 ypr
2. Washington - 28.00
3. Central Michigan - 24.00
4. Kansas State - 22.07
5. Houston - 20.50
6. LSU - 20.00
7. Rutgers - 17.25
8. North Carolina State - 17.00
9. Kent State - 16.00
9. Penn State - 16.00
23. Illinois - 12.00
62. Nebraska - 7.33

124. Kansas - (-1.00)

PUNT RETURN DEFENSE
1. Cockeye (-4.00) ypr
2. Houston (-2.00)
3. Kent State (-1.00)
4. Miami (OH) (-0.50)
5. Florida International - (-0.20)
6. Toledo - 0.00
6. Buffalo - 0.00
6. Eastern Michigan - 0.00
6. Minnesota - 0.00
6. Ohio - 0.00
6. Oregon - 0.00
6. San Jose State - 0.00
23. Illinois - 2.33
117. Nebraska - 17.60

124. Washington - 60.00

KICKOFF RETURNS
1. LSU - 36.50 ypr
2. Wake Forest - 34.00
3. Georgia - 32.21
4. Air Force - 32.00
5. Bowling Green - 30.67
6. Cockeye State - 29.69
7. Cincinnati - 28.82
8. Florida International - 28.67
9. Texas - 28.33
10. Texas-El Paso - 27.95
86. Illinois - 18.33
106. Nebraska - 16.25

123. UCLA - 9.00

KICKOFF RETURN DEFENSE
1. Missouri - 0.00 ypr
1. Bowling Green - 0.00
1. Penn State - 0.00
4. Massachusetts - 10.50
5. Minnesota - 12.27
6. Ball State - 12.40
7. Arkansas State - 13.06
8. Oregon State - 14.00
9. Nebraska - 14.43
10. BYU - 14.67
34. Illinois - 18.17
124. LSU - 31.40

TURNOVER MARGIN (per game)
1. Wake Forest (+2.14)
2. Washington (+2.00)
2. Buffalo (+2.00)
2. Indiana (+2.00)
2. Colorado (+2.00)
6. Central Florida (+1.57)
7. Wisconsin (+1.50)
7. Central Michigan (+1.50)
7. Western Michigan (+1.50)
10. Illinois (+1.25)
61. Nebraska (0.00)

124. UCLA (-4.00)

PENALTY YARDS PER GAME
1. Wisconsin - 10.00 ypg
2. Rice - 17.50
3. Southern Mississippi - 30.00
4. Coastal Carolina - 32.57
5. Arizona State - 34.00
6. Washington - 35.00
7. Utah State - 36.00
8. Boise State - 36.75
9. Western Kentucky - 36.89
10. BYU - 37.38
83. Nebraska - 61.33
105. Illinois - 73.75
124. Tulsa - 96.20

AVG TIME OF POSSESSION
1. Wisconsin - 41:51
2. Toledo - 38:42
3. Washington - 36:59
4. Minnesota - 35:42
5. Georgia Southern - 35:32
6. Charlotte - 35:08
7. Northern Illinois - 35:02
8. Rice - 34:54
9. San Diego State - 34:10
10. Coastal Carolina - 34:06
100. Nebraska - 27:36
121. Illinois - 24:28
124. UCLA - 20:29
 
Thought the same thing, but they have played 8 games (3+ TOs a game is still hilarious though). Not a great year to look at raw numbers with the stats, given the differential in games played.
Exactamumdo. While these things usually sort themselves out by the end of the season, the CFB Playoff Committee is going to have some challenges picking the 4 teams this year, IMO. You'd think they'd go with the best Power 5 teams at the end, but there are some non-P5 teams that are having brilliant seasons (BYU, Cincinnati, etc.). Like everything else in 2020, it's going to be "different".
 
Exactamumdo. While these things usually sort themselves out by the end of the season, the CFB Playoff Committee is going to have some challenges picking the 4 teams this year, IMO. You'd think they'd go with the best Power 5 teams at the end, but there are some non-P5 teams that are having brilliant seasons (BYU, Cincinnati, etc.). Like everything else in 2020, it's going to be "different".
I don't expect the outcome to be much different though. They'll find a way to keep Cinci out for sure. I could see them justifying BYU since they're an independent. Less risk.

Thank God we avoided Cinci beating our ass at home. Take the good with the horrible (rest of 2020), right?
 
I don't expect the outcome to be much different though. They'll find a way to keep Cinci out for sure. I could see them justifying BYU since they're an independent. Less risk.

Thank God we avoided Cinci beating our ass at home. Take the good with the horrible (rest of 2020), right?
Agree with all of that, including dodging the whoopin' at the hands of the Bearcats.
 
Cincinnati has UCF and Tulsa left. Two pretty good teams. If they dominate them its going to be very difficult to keep them out vs a 1 loss SEC team.

Edit: That's assuming Notre Dame loses. No way they keep Clemson out for losing to ND without Lawrence.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top