Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Eh. He's actually been pretty freaking solid the past 11 years... 97-43 isn't awful.
Average of basically 9 wins a year (taking out 2020, 6-2) with some 12 win seasons in there. They were definitely 2 close losses from a playoff this year.
But this goes back to the general question of what...
Just the counter point to your AI post. Sometimes after .500 it could get better.
It probably won't but it could.
But the reality is almost every coaching hire ever has a less than 20% chance of working out long term. Maybe less than 10%.
You're smarter than that aren't you?
Where you started matters. Hey coach having a .500 3-year stretch 8-12 years into his tenure is WAY different than when you took over a program in the dumpster.
And the third example didn't get better in year four. We absolutely would have fired him after...
Honestly if you follow Facebook groups (I try not to) it was still a really really large contingent of fans that wanted to keep him at the end.
Mind bottling. People vastly underestimate how long it would take for the non-obsessive fans to want to fire a guy.
Obviously he needs to do more next year.
But just to be clear, we would probably fire Kirk several times over his tenure.
Possibly after 01, probably after 07, probably after 14...
And probably after his racism scandal.
The first 3 years: 11-24 worse
05-07: 19-18 (coming off a 31-7 stretch) is worse considering starting point
10-12: Again, coming off a good couple years makes 19-19 really bad
Since we're talking about .500 coaching then doing well, it's pretty easy to argue how Ferentz has done that multiple...