Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
No, you’d never decline a targeting for any reason. If that happened NU would still get the 15 yards tacked back on.
This is also not even possible as a team can’t advance their own fumble, NU is the reason for that rule.
You’re completely ignoring how a defense plays in those conditions. There isn’t much fear of the O going over the top of your D so you can play much more tight at the line.
Yeah no one works on it which is what Deans question was. You work on reading the safety and throwing to another route or 50 other things in practice that’s far more productive.
Are you and Dean aware that college DPI isn’t a spot foul past 15 yards. Also if you could just put the ball wherever on command like that you’d just hit the guy in stride so he had a chance to get yards after the catch.
No one would actually practice or work on this.
Thankfully this is the kind of data and study that a high schooler could set up, so there is a really strong chance of a direct causal link.
Also, your logic on game play vs practice is absolutely atrocious, but I’m guessing you’re trolling.